At the least though, the degree and the tonality of banal detail here, with some public records corroboration, decreases the odds this was ever in any way part of some grand strategy of disinformation, or a leak of something big that had been held under wraps. It reads as just a credentialed (and convincing) kook who got someone with authority to listen to him.
Maybe that person in authority thought "well, it doesn't cost much to try", or, "we need to keep this guy (Pais) happy so he'll finish his other more important tasks" -- then again, maybe they did think in terms of grand disinfo strategy. But nothing outlandish is really required to explain what we can now see.