> I think the ethics violation needs to be somewhat related to the research
I think this covers that:
> This article was probably written to defend MIT president Rafael Reif's decision to mark Epstein's post-conviction donations to MIT as anonymous.
I think this covers that:
> This article was probably written to defend MIT president Rafael Reif's decision to mark Epstein's post-conviction donations to MIT as anonymous.
...it's just wildly implausible, or is that me? The author of this piece on game theory has written it at the behest of Reif, or to support Reif...somehow? I promise you Reif has no idea about this article.
The anonymous donations issue is a HUGE part of this. Trust me.
https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/7/10/20689134/jeffrey-eps...
https://www.insider.com/epstein-riyadh-saudi-arabia-private-...
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2019/8/18/dubin-epstein-u...
https://columbusfreepress.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-there%...
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/08/if-epstein-stole-fro....
https://dealbreaker.com/2019/08/les-wexner-writes-foundation...
https://www.queerty.com/jeffrey-epsteins-chilling-remarks-ho...
https://www.businessinsider.com/investigation-of-jeffrey-eps...
... and more and more to come for sure as criminal prosecution of Mr. Epstein's most famous "recruiter" gets underway, the daughter of disgraced publishing magnate Robert Maxwell.