I agree. I've personally noticed time and time again how git-based workflows discourage me personally from making small one-time changes like typo fixes compared to a wiki or similar. It's just so much more overhead to have to start up a CLI, edit the document, push a commit, open a pull request etc…

This is not to say there aren't advantages to the git-based workflow and it might be a valid choice for a technical audience like this, but to claim it as "huge advantage in terms of contribution workflow" seems questionable.