Hacker News Reader

Comment by tetrometal | Hacker News Reader

Contrary to the hypocritical ravings of the left, I think election challenges are healthy for democracy. I wish they happened every time. I don't have a lot of trust in them as-is, and whatever the outcome of Trump's challenges, one of them will be that anyone thinking about committing fraud will likely think again after all this.

https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the-2020-presidential-elect...

View on HN

In general most people I see aren’t against the legal challenges. They are against the trial in the court of his supporters opinion that he is running. Because arguments that are meritless/fabrications can be brought up with no repercussions. Based on the pitiful weak arguments he made in court it seems like his team wasn’t even trying to win an actual court case, they were playing it up to rally his base.

The trial in the court is a legal challenge. I don't really have a problem with Trump (or Biden) supporters being rallied. Why does "rally his base" have a bad connotation in your mind?

Because it tends to lead to public officials getting death threats or people with guns outside of their houses at night. Whatever that is, it's not rallying.

I think the angst in the public sphere is much, much deeper than some politician "rallying their base".

My take is that the federal government has accrued far, far more power than was ever intended. The entire population of the US has to fight over who is in charge at the federal level in order to live their lives the way they would like.

The founders had the right idea - a federation of states with a variety of laws that the people could choose among, glued together by a weak federal government.

That was the Articles of Confederation more than anything. The current federal government was meant to be strong after the fiascoes of the AC. And the Founders, once they were in power, almost universally worked towards a stronger federal government and concentrating power. I mean, Jefferson purchased Louisiana from Napoleon unilaterally without consulting congress; maybe the most massively illegal abuse of power in the history of the US.

It’s ok to challenge and ask for proof. It’s not ok to blatantly ignore this proof once provided without any justification. It’s not ok to “feel” something is’t right because it’s against your bias.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com