https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25371653.
I'm going by the photo on his Twitter account, but it's as valid a guess as any other. If you went by how I look or by my legal name, you would be wrong, and I would be annoyed at someone on a website chastising others for not using what they assumed was correct.
Assumptions are presumptuous and harmful. Everyone is a they/them until otherwise stated. These are extremely useful pronouns.
You're a they/them.
Calm down. You seem to be overly attached to regressive labels. I don't know what drives this in you, but the universe is burning and people just want to be happy. Your life is short; you're going to die and rot away. Is this really something to get worked up over?
In the future, when our descendants are all uploaded to computers or replaced by an AI overlord, people will be all sorts of genders. They won't be bound by yesterday's norms. Would you be a stuffy gender policeperson, or will you just let people be who they are?
Why on Earth are you trying to dictate someone else's pronouns?
Language is hard, so I understand the need for compromise. “Zee” could be used to avoid gender centric labeling while maintaining language clarity.
Actual-historically, from 1375, not so much.
https://public.oed.com/blog/a-brief-history-of-singular-they...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they#Usage
> They with a singular antecedent goes back to the Middle English of the 14th century... and has remained in common use for centuries...
What I said is correct. Prior to about 4-5 years ago you did not find people using they in the singular, hence "in common use".
It is grammatically plural, but it has been accepted for semantically singular use since long before the Victorian effort to impose Latin-inspired rules on English usage which failed to eradicate it despite intense effort. (Victorian prescriptivism did have some good effects — regularized spelling FTW — but trying to eradicate clear and useful usages like singular “they” was one of its less-well-considered, but fortunately also less-successful, efforts.)
Nothing in what you wrote contradicts what I stated. The man on the street thinks they is plural, and nearly all writing treats it that way. Historical examples excepted.