Can't thoughtful discourse begin on a topic that is wrong, discussing why it is wrong? For example, I'd love to see a critique of what is wrong with:

http://alternativephysics.org/book/GPSmythology.htm

...which makes the claim that you don't need to correct for relativistic effects for GPS to work correctly. I don't see an immediate, obvious flaw in his thinking, so I think it would be great to have as a conversation starter with someone more knowledgeable.

In fact, thinking about it more, doesn't stack overflow essentially depend on people being wrong and needing correction?