Hacker News Reader

Comment by antpls | Hacker News Reader

I believe it is important to keep the physical version at a safe place for as long as possible. How long before a new wave of "flat earthers" decides the digital version is just a deep fake and it never existed?

View on HN

They'll say the physical version is a fake too.

Though I say for really important works, having a physical copy in addition to the digital one is a must. Digital data is easy to copy — and easy to lose. And bit rot is a thing.

Something else important w/r/t keeping originals: Who could have foreseen that our new imaging technology would allow us to read the otherwise-unreadable original text of palimpsests, or the insides of scrolls too brittle to unroll?

What other discoveries might be unpredictable right now? For example, some new development might tell us two things were made in the same place and time, leading to discovery by inference, or something.

Originals might prove valuable in ways not yet known.

well it is important, that the digitized version can be traced back to the original.

Why is it important? So we can show that it couldn't have been faked after the digitizing process?

Flat earthers are lunatics, and you have to ask the question who the bigger fool is: The fool or the on who tries to argue with the fool.

I don't believe anyone has ever convinced a flatearther with reason.

I wouldn't trust them with the physical copy to verify it, so I don't know that it makes a difference.

I suspect 10-20 years ago?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com