You’re only able to type and communicate this message because of science. If you’re going to say something so inflammatory, you better have an argument to back it up.
But one could also say that science wouldn’t be allowed to flourish if we didn’t have peace for example (what we experience now is rare in the history of humanity), and that the institutions that support peace are involved in being able to type and communicate this.
And note that my comment says nothing about the person I’m arguing with, it just pre-empts a common response and calls the response nonsense.
> It's because of applied science. Most of the science won't be applied.