This is a tough pill to swallow but you’ll get it down eventually.
This is a tough pill to swallow but you’ll get it down eventually.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Edit: we've had to ask you this more than once before, and (coincidentally) almost in exactly the same terms: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23398227. Could you please take the intended spirit of HN more to heart, and please fix this? We're looking for curious conversation here. How you raise a topic like this is by far the biggest influence on whether the conversation develops curiously.
An influence surely, but in my experience not at all the biggest. Curiosity is a two-way street, and there are some topics that most people here simply do not want to be curious about.
But yes, I’m mostly just spending karma fighting an info-war. Success in that context is not only about the quality of discussion, it’s that more people see the controversy. If the collateral damage is not acceptable I understand.
And if I end up getting kicked out, please just take to heart that your effort to apply the rules impartially is not unappreciated. The opposition here is used to receiving wildly-inflammatory escalating nasty replies that rarely get flagged or moderated, but it’s still better than most places: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25017661
But one could also say that science wouldn’t be allowed to flourish if we didn’t have peace for example (what we experience now is rare in the history of humanity), and that the institutions that support peace are involved in being able to type and communicate this.
And note that my comment says nothing about the person I’m arguing with, it just pre-empts a common response and calls the response nonsense.
> It's because of applied science. Most of the science won't be applied.