Fictional employee. Fictional scenario. But you still assume that the employee isn't smart enough to know why bolts are different sizes and whether a bigger bolt could work in the place of the smaller bolts.
You assume you know more about this fictional car than the fictional employee actually (um, I mean fictionally) building it.
You should apply for management.
Reductively it's CoW snapshots + chroot.
Guess I need to find a new job.
People don't have to hyper-specialize to one specific role.
> There's really no reason to think the person turning the bolt necessarily knows what size the bolt needs to be.
and also steel-manned the final sentence like this:
> In the same way a web dev doesn't need to know how docker works
As such, the (claimed) existence of one person who regularly uses very different skills doesn't disprove what I think jacobsenscott was trying to say.
Example using the same logic as the post we're discussing: Someone flips a coin in another room. It doesn't necessarily have to be heads, so we should assume it's tails.
It sounds like you are not familiar with this disaster:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyatt_Regency_walkway_collapse
There may be a very good reason things are the way they are.