www.cnn.com/videos/us/2020/11/16/south-dakota-nurse-intv-newday-vpx.cnn
www.cnn.com/videos/us/2020/11/16/south-dakota-nurse-intv-newday-vpx.cnn
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/report001.pdf
(See, in particular, figure #2 on page #2.)
You don't need to trust him personally.
You do, though. You need to trust that he's not omitting critical information, either via ignorance or deliberate malice.
Information like this:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/tech_notes.htm
> It is important to note that it can take several weeks for death records to be submitted to National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), processed, coded, and tabulated. Therefore, the data shown on this page may be incomplete, and will likely not include all deaths that occurred during a given time period, especially for the more recent time periods.
This is the website they cite as their source for South Dakota: https://doh.sd.gov/news/Coronavirus.aspx I don't seem to be able to access it - not sure if that's geoblocking (I'm in Canada) or it's down at the moment.
> Deaths: SD-DOH does not report deaths until a certified death record has been filed with COVID-19 as a cause or contributing factor. By law, a death record must be filed within 5 days of the date of death.
(I don't know how long it takes between filing and processing after that point, but it's clear that there's potential time between death and showing up in the count.)
Does the site list deaths by date of report, or date of death? Hopefully the later, so we can just check back in a few weeks.
Anyway, in general this "dying breath" stuff doesn't really tell anyone anything useful. For starters, how much faith do you really want to put in what people say when they're so sick they're about to die? Hypoxia significantly affects mental capacities: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUfF2MTnqAw
For all you know, these people don't actually realize that they're sick at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
It's far from clear how to unravel the paradox, but it's certainly not as simple as "let's just all coexist in peace". It's asymmetric: it only takes one person to break the peace.
Who doesn't allow two thoughts at the same time. Isn't that violation against free speech? Do opposite of that.
Of course, if her employer comes out and says "her statement doesn't match reality" and decides she can't be trusted and gets fired, that changes things. Some will see it as "justified" because she made it up while others will see it as a "coverup to hide the facts!" and again, few obvious/immediate downsides.
sigh
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/04/24/ventilato...
The twit obviously didn't read more than the headline.
Probably hadn't read more than the headline of anything actually.