The popular rhetoric that having an IP is having the location is most often wrong unless Your users have static IPs registered to them. The way law enforcement does it is by subpoening the owner of the IP of pointing to the user associated with the IP at specific time but that still is prone to errors because of NATs - many distinct clients behind a single address.
All in all fingerprinting is using IPs pretty rarely nowadays.
2 settings, one for Wi-Fi scanning and one for Bluetooth
(Supposedly; I don't own an up-to-date Android device.)
Having said that, both Apple APNS and Google FCM do send regular heartbeat to their respective servers which make your positional tracking possible by both companies.
If you had access to a significant portion of a country/world's emails, imagine the power you truly have.
Your mileage may vary of course.
Seems insane to me, it's one of those thing you take for granted elsewhere, yeah of course my mobile ISP knows my location, as does the govt if they ask the ISP in an email, that's fine. (Quite sure most carriers have no qualms just handing it over on request)
But just selling that info for cents to any third party seems so utterly egregious and a massive betrayal of consumer trust.
Based on what evidence?
I turned off mail sync, I only trigger it manually, so there is a way to avoid the constant checking.