There are poll workers of both major parties; presumably if they interpreted the rules in a flagrantly partisan way, poll workers from the other party would have objected.
Oh wow that settles it, then! Case closed.
By the way, got any tips on how to learn mind-reading? You seem really good at it.
This is a particularly funny response given that your entire argument hinges on inferring someone’s motive for interpreting the rules in a particular way.
Where did that happen? Or do your psychic abilities allow you to bend time and space as well?
> So when a poll worker deviates from the stated rules, it necessitates investigating why that happened (and deciding if such a deviation was proper).
> What an amazing coincidence it is that this poll worker just so happened to deviate from the guidelines in a way that aligns with their admitted personal opinions and biases!
Please never sign up to be a poll worker.