Regarding the latter, ask yourself, "What possible business value does Hunter Biden offer the CCP?" None. This is known as "CCP elite capture."
Is the New York Post story the Hunter Biden laptop story? I've seen plenty of reporting on it and the details seem pretty sketchy.
2. https://twitter.com/Defend_Trump/status/1322512161969758209
3. https://twitter.com/HawgGnarly/status/1320952391794003968
There's literally dozens of videos of him slurring out words that don't exist.
I've also said things that don't make sense. Sometimes I change my mind about what I'm going to say in the middle of saying it. I'm sure this sort of thing happens to lots of people. Lucky for me I'm not talking in front of cameras so people can collect every time I've misspoken.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/12/its-fair-...
https://www.newsbreak.com/news/1522263069032/young-turks-fou...
I hope he wins, because Trump is fundamentally unfit to be president, but I am worried about cognitive decline nonetheless.
Edited: removed incorrect reference to Clinton campaign from 2016.
Sure, I can find videos of Biden being a gaffe-prone stutterer probably that are older than the internet, certainly I've seen Biden doing that since before his first Presidential campaign, and it's not something that helps himmon the campaign trail.
But it's not evidence of cognitive decline, either.
> Also, it wasn’t Trump who started saying it - it was Hilary Clinton’s team when Biden was in the primaries in 2016.
Biden didn't run for anything in 2016 and so wasn't in any primaries that cycle, so that's obviously false.
You are correct - I was wrong about the Clinton team in 2016. It was in fact the democratic party in 2019. As documented in the link.
You can deny it or call it just ‘gaffes’, if you like, but people should watch the (mainstream - not YouTube fakes) videos for themselves.
Either way it’s not a rumor Trump started, and there is plenty of evidence for people to consider.
Well, sure, it's clear that that, after repeatedly asserting that the Trump attack is true without evidence, that's clearly the narrative about the Trump attack's origin that Intercept article, but none of their supposed examples actually use anything like the line of attack they try furiously to associate them with. Even as “decide on the narrative and then see why evidence we can try to use to sell it” articles go, that’s pretty weak tea.
“I’m no doctor, and I had a family member whose dementia contributed to his death. I will be the last one here speculating wildly about Biden’s cognitive abilities relative to his age. But his campaign is irresponsible to let this go unexplained — or undiagnosed, if the case may be.”
https://theintercept.imgix.net/wp-uploads/sites/1/2020/03/ja...
“the question is, does he still have his stuff? How sharp is he?”
Dismiss it if you like, but there is nothing ambiguous or weak about what they said.