1. A single service has full visibility into your habits
2. The upper bound for the efficacy of each service is higher.
Is this worth it to you? That's the question you should be asking yourself. 1. A single service has full visibility into your habits
2. The upper bound for the efficacy of each service is higher.
Is this worth it to you? That's the question you should be asking yourself.I'm still not sure I understand your comment, but I would add that that even with multiple services, each can buy data from each other and from brokers, bringing the situation with them closer to a multiple-google situation.
Problems like this cannot be solved by technology.
edit: Being all Google may ultimately be more similar to the Apple proposition, where they actively fight their users to maximize their own profits, but also actively fight others for the complete possession of their users. As an Apple customer, you know that if your usage is irrelevant to their bottom line, they'll generally protect you from third parties. The reason it's not obvious that Google could be that way is because they're an ad company.