Your narrative really doesn't sound real, and your argument of "ignore them!" comes across to me an attempt to psychologically bias other readers who are even less knowledgeable.
Yanis in conversation with Chomsky, long but insightful.
Yanis in conversation with Chomsky, long but insightful.
This obviously sounds like an ad hominem, but it's really hard to distinguish the writing from the writer when it comes to his articles (which are everywhere, apparently). In fact this is common in his writings, and his articles consistently attract this kind of criticism.
Which of his specific points are you disagreeing with?
What platitudes?
What are examples of his writings or talks where he is not clear to you?
- i didn't say i disagree. in fact i find no argument (except from the fairytale part that really isnt worth discussing) (PS @ameetgaitonde sums it up pretty nicely, really nothing more to say)
- The supposed recap of recent history, full with affectionate dimunitives like maggie. It's just bad writing
- Again, everything. I ve read a lot. Can you point one article that has an actual point? His articles are the GPT-3 of economics.
And i mean, its not just me, none of the comments here are about the text. Perhaps because theres nothing to talk about there.