If they have no influence, why bother censoring some information?
Which is it?
Which is it?
Not to mention it is THE platform where ALL politicians, journalists and public reside. In that respect it has de facto become the public square for discussing politics.
Doesn't add up.
And frankly, I'm not taking a political side as much as I am pointing out their actions don't add up either way.
Where it comes from isn't the same thing as what it is.
On the other hand, Twitter changed their rules now, so other people will be able to link to the data? I wouldn't be surprised if they have to add another epicycle soon when they don't suppress something the majority agrees they should.