Your own source contradicts you:

> The two people said they could not confirm whether any of the material presented to them was the same as that which has been recently published in the U.S.

Furthermore, they made no effort to determine the authenticity of the documents, so I find it odd that you assume they must be fake:

> The two people who said they were approached with Hunter Biden’s alleged emails last year did not know whether any of them were real

So you used two anonymous sources to support your erroneous conclusion, yet you don't believe all of the sources who have publicly come forward to say the documents are legitimate?

Very interesting.