You keep twisting what people say only to respond with gotchas and try to wear down your opponents.
You keep twisting what people say only to respond with gotchas and try to wear down your opponents.
You are saying that you don’t care about police dying.
I could point out that police are people, so what you are doing here is to dehumanize anyone who you consider to be police.
However, I accept that you wouldn’t recognize that argument, because you then go on to say, that they can quit whenever they want.
I.e. they can avoid being killed by simply making the choice not to be Police.
This is the very definition of political violence - threatening the lives of people who support institutions you don’t like.
“I will always choose the people over the police, even if the people are violent. A public mob is better than a police mob.”
“Until the police are held accountable to the public, I feel no remorse for anything that happens to them.”
“the public needs to do it by whatever means necessary even if that harms innocent police officers”
Seems pretty clear what you are advocating. You don’t have to say things like this if they aren’t what you mean.
I choose to help the people, not the police.
“the public needs to do it by whatever means necessary even if that harms innocent police officers”
Advocating methods that knowingly include harming the innocent is advocating violence.
You are clearly advocating violence.
Why not just admit it?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24874243
I think it’s reasonable to assume you won’t, because if you could have without resorting to denial and gaslighting, you would have done.
As I said before and you never addressed: if I say I don't care about you, does that mean I'm advocating violence against you?