Hacker News Reader

Pet curiosity ... if the inventors would humour me.

What was the thinking behind adopting the `end` notation for marking the end of blocks. I know that certain family of PLs (Erlang, Ruby) use them. But the dominant flavor is the `{}` syntax (c/c++/scala/rust etc)

Was it an explicit choice or more based on your past familiarity with other languages?

View on HN

The reason is that they want to reserve the curly braces for other uses and the language devs call using `{}` to delimit code a 'waste of valuable ascii characters'.

Julia currently uses {} mostly for type systemy things like parametric types. When I write Foo{T}, this says that T is a parameter in the type Foo.

E.g. a vector of Float64s in julia is an Array{Float64, 1} (1 means one dimensional) whereas a matrix of vectors of complex Ints is an Array{Array{Complex{Int}, 1}, 2}.

It’s from Matlab. That’s really it. Well, and probably {} are perfectly good characters that shouldn’t be wasted on code blocks.

So it's from Fortran ;)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com