But the voyager probes too could ink out of existence, and the signals they're sending back wouldn't expand the map, they would just be hijacked by the simulation to send back whatver the devs wanted it to.
But the voyager probes too could ink out of existence, and the signals they're sending back wouldn't expand the map, they would just be hijacked by the simulation to send back whatver the devs wanted it to.
Wouldn't that require the devs to simulate whatever code we put on the probe? Did you just discover an attack vector for hacking the simulation?
Perhaps the Great Silence is simply down to early Black Hat Aliens who've been feeding fictions to all civilisations that develop beyond straight to eye (etc) optical (etc) instruments?
I think the silence is just that: silence. We're it (right now).
Because of gravity, an entire civilization could live as long as we will on earth but on the right planet it could only take them 30 years per hour (like on interstellar where they were gone an hour on the planet, but off-planet 7 years passed.)
They could've started at the same time, but only be 10 years in, while we've transversed millenia.
Or could be exactly the same as how we evolved, except they did it 1 billion years ago, and died out 500 million years ago.
Top 3 contenders though for me for the fermi silence is: 1. Great Filter wins. 2. Time and Distance scales of space, and 3. We're living in a simulation. Aliens weren't part of the plan.
if alien life were out there, I don't think it'd just be content to hide out. I mean, look at our planet and the food chain, EVERY living thing competes for it's place on the food chain, and in the world. Extra-terrestrially I think we'd also compete w/ other races and see expansions.
If we lived 1 billion years, it's almost a certainty that we could colonize ALL of the milky way, and maybe other galaxies. Def. Andromeda since it'll merge with us soon enough.
That said - My point being - even if there is a tenth of a tenth of a tenth of a chance that my speculation is possibly not entirely incorrect, it then becomes of the utmost importance that going forward that we oblige ourselves in having some almost Monasterial-like utterly analogue back up where external input of first principles are wholly questioned; proved as much as possible from outwith the digital realm and then transcribed and stored in flesh, or by hand, or memory and voice. Elsewise, how do we know our ideas have not been interfered with?