Hacker News Reader

Regardless of samples, obvious typos are a sign of lack of regard for quality

What cebert is saying, and what I absolutely agree with, is that if the copy on the website itself contains bad or clumsy English, then I'm not going to explore the samples themselves.

I have to perform a few double-takes as I read the site to try and parse the meaning out. I did duck into the samples themselves, and it's much the same there as well.

Are you serious? Why on earth would anyone pay a content factory which has terrible grammar on their home page? And this is a poor response too. But good luck on your first business. The good thing is you always profit: either in money or in knowledge on how to do a better job next time.

I understand your point. And I also admit my mistake. I didn't want to ignore this, that is why I am answering... After the website is created, I have written some content in it and I don't write, so it may be my fault, that's why I asked you to check the sample as it has been written by our writers. Hope you understand!