Did you know that the NY Post was founded by Alexander Hamilton?
>In 1976, Rupert Murdoch bought the Post for US$30.5 million. [...] The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch's ownership for sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias.
I think you will find that there are many of us that are quite dismayed at the state of things here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenhower%27s_farewell_addres...
because in the case of the new york post, the only thing that remained after 230 years is the branding. The writers, editors, and general "culture" at the newspaper has completely changed. On the other hand, the constitution has remained static. Nothing has changed. We can argue whether this is a bad thing or a good thing, but it's fundamentally incomparable to what happened to the new york post.
The citizens and institutions and general "culture" of the United States of America has also completely changed since 1789.
Also no New Yorker thinks the Post is a serious newspaper. Its most well known features are bad and tasteless puns cover headlines and a gossip page called "Page Six" which itself is not even on the 6th page of the paper.
I believe the Bill of Rights and the rest of the amendments would disagree with you. That's supposed to be the beauty of the US Constitution is that it was designed to be able to be updated.