Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

gridlockd

Any discussion of HCQ that ignores zinc, a key part of the original treatment protocol, is missing the mark.

Rationale:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030698772...

Trial:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32930657/

View on HN

A paper published in Nature is being criticized as "too neutral" for pointing out that the evidence is inconclusive.

My comment is getting heavily downvoted, despite being properly sourced. No counter-argument or evidence is presented.

Why? Does nobody care to explain themselves?

Maybe your negative tone or the low information density. I guess just dropping links is frowned upon. You could have written a short summary or at least paste the TLDR from these papers and then link to the sources.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com