What Florian seems to be insinuating is that Android application developers would be somehow at risk in some way from this ruling due to them having written programs that "use the teachings of the infringed patent claims in one way or another". What is that even supposed to mean?

If I write code to target a platform whose implementation infringes a patent somewhere deep 'beneath the hood' I am not liable to pay any damages for that, I did not ship infringing code and my code is agnostic to whether the platform infringes or not.

I cannot see the need (besides FUD) for Florian to have written that. He mixes cherry picked facts and analysis with wild speculation (commonly involving Android's 'bleak future') and hopes that people won't see the difference.

Edit: As another example, see how he conveniently forgot to mention the factor of the finding coming from an East Texas court when he extrapolates from this verdict to all Android related patent suits.