After SB10 was passed by the legislature, the opposition (mostly bail bond companies?) gathered enough signatures to force a "veto referendum", i.e. a referendum on whether SB10 should be adopted as the legislature had voted, or should be dropped. That referendum is Prop 25.
Edit: Parent is right, the link is to a different issue.
Yeah, what does that have to do with the paper the parent linked?
Prop 25 upholds SB 10. This paper suggests improvements to SB10 based on potential biases in its design.
I got it. It just seemed like from the phrasing of your post that a link to the description of Prop 25 would have made more sense.
The description of Prop 25 doesn't include any details about the risk assessment model. This is the only doc I've found that does.