Interesting.
I’m now curious how multi[1] compares to Fluid[2]. I haven’t used it in a while, but that app used to be present on all my installs.
Can’t remember what happened that I stopped using it.
I’m now curious how multi[1] compares to Fluid[2]. I haven’t used it in a while, but that app used to be present on all my installs.
Can’t remember what happened that I stopped using it.
Fluid was proprietary commercial software (and the author was also a real jerk).
I had some positive interactions with the author. He went out of his way to explain how to do something that wasn't officially supported (how to include my own user scripts).
Nothing major. But way better support than I ever expected for a $5(!) desktop app.
The license seems ambiguous though because there's no LICENSE file in the repo and the website has copy about requiring a paid license to use the software; the only place GPLv3 is mentioned is in the README. I opened an issue requesting clarification.
Edit: no idea what the software mentioned above does, just correcting a common misconception.
If I'm incorrectly co-opting some open source nomenclature, I'd love if someone could let me know. As I said in the issue linked above, I do need to update the purchase website to bring that language more inline with what's on GitHub.
It's perfectly legit. You can find the sources for these items elsewhere on the web but the hassle and security implications just aren't worth it.