Maybe the creator of this should give a use case? I'm struggling to understand just what problem this is trying to solve here, and from the looks of the comments, so are many other people.
Instead of using central web servers, it is replaced with a network of Vapor nodes. I don't see this solving any problem. Just because HTTP requests have a Bitcoin signature, that does not solve any web-of-trust issues.
> record authenticated HTTP requests and replay them anywhere.
This is confusing, either identities cost real Bitcoin or you have a Sybil attack problem (numerous fake identities). If you need real Bitcoins, it requires lots of effort to use Vapor. As it is written, this is not going to work.
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say we’re being trolled. The emperor is naked.