Hacker News Reader

Comment by nathcd | Hacker News Reader

> Except for a small handful of North American cities -- literally five or less -- Lafayette provides an insight into why your city has no money.

...

> It's a predicament that nearly every American city, with very few exceptions, finds itself in.

Does anyone know some of the American cities that don't follow this pattern?

View on HN

Contrary to what he says, pretty much none of the cities follow this pattern. Infrastructure maintenance is not a significant cost in most cities budgets, and the only cities that really have any significant problems with it are the ones that are decaying altogether for non-infrastructure related reasons (eg. main employer left, and people are leaving too).

Do you have anything I can read which contradicts his point on the cost of infrastructure spending? I'd like to see the counterpoint to his thesis.

I made a comment a while ago to that effect:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22909240

His thesis falls apart already if you do a back of a napkin calculation.

Here is another case study: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22913531

Is maintenance not a significant cost because the infrastructure doesn't need maintenance, or is it not a significant cost because the infrastructure is left to decay?

Pick a few towns at random, look at their budgets, look at their road quality in Google Streetview, and see for yourself. I would love to hear of any examples of infrastructure costs killing cities, but I simply couldn't find any.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com