Then why have the list? What's the point?
Some freedoms I can think of off the top of my head that weren't true of the states last century (that I find more important than naming):
- freedom to effectively vote for candidates from a multitude of political parties.
- freedom to roam.
- freedom to open retail bank accounts in any major currency.
- freedom to talk back to cops without (any, let alone mortal) reprisal.
- freedom (not in my commune, but in nearby jurisdictions) to pay taxes in cryptocurrency.
- freedom to distill my own schnapps, drink it out of an open container in the middle of a public road, in front of cops, while driving (the last is an exaggeration, but pedantically true).
And a freedom-from that's important to me: on the few occasions I have to go to the big city, I know that the homeless-looking guy I see downtown has an apartment. He just looks like he's been sleeping on the streets.
And what-about-isms are hardly helpful. Thanks for a patriotic recitation of rights you enjoy - all very nice. But for the life of me I can't figure what that has to do with a bureaucratic committee that imagines that interfering with naming children is accomplishing something useful?
For my part, I will faithfully, should my government wish to interfere with your freedom to name your children anything, do my utmost to dissuade them.
In return, could you please attempt do something about your government's (and your corporations', respectively) current interference with my constitutional freedom from nosey parkers?
"Art. 13 Right to privacy
1 Every person has the right to privacy in their private and family life and in their home, and in relation to their mail and telecommunications.
2 Every person has the right to be protected against the misuse of their personal data."
Deal?
Sure we need some rules about what's reasonable to record. In fact, we're getting them. But reigning in corporations is harder than making a rule. Because there's money at stake, it's hard to get a ravenous corporation to change behavior with a little fine or whatever.
So sure, I'm on the side of privacy, as should have been obvious. But not sure I can fix this, sorry.