It's not like Apple and Google can't move, there's like 200 countries, that's like a hundred times more countries than app stores
It's not like Apple and Google can't move, there's like 200 countries, that's like a hundred times more countries than app stores
Your sarcasm about the flight of capital and corporations is maybe more right than you realize.
Sadly, maybe also the part about not having to justify its laws at all...
We don’t have laws that Apple is breaking. Almost all legal analysts agree Epic’s case is a long shot designed to attract legislative intervention.
Not really. Court cases are all about justifying why an action or inaction meets or fails a law. Legislation is all about justifying why a cause requires legislative action.
Exercising freedoms, for a person or group of people pursuing common enterprise, does not need to be justified. The moment it does, it’s not a right. And choosing how to price an unregulated inessential good outside emergency conditions is not activity Americans have to justify to their government.
No, choosing how to price things is needed for modern capitalism to work which is why we have antitrust laws. The question you should ask yourself is "if the 30% tax is many times higher than what it costs Apple to deliver the service, what forces would cause Apple to reduce said tax?", if you can't come up with an answer then we need antitrust action here.
The cost of the service for Apple is irrelevant in this court case.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Tax_Freedom_Act
Reads like a joke now?
1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_erosion_and_profit_shif...
Oh, absolutely 100% positively 'not true' - the US 100% has to 'justify it's laws'.
While 'something should be done here' I don't think prices need to be regulated, rather, just opening up fair market conditions in different layers of the value chain.
Just making 3rd party apps and app-stores available on each platform would suffice.