vs

OpenNX for accessing Windows Remote Desktop or Terminal services (that is needed because companies use internally developed applications running on Windows only)

If they're fully OpenBSD, why do they need Windows Remote Desktop for access to internally developed software? Why are internal devs making Windows software? It doesn't seem to be a typo given the way the comment is structured.

I mean, good on 'em for reducing their OS management overhead, but this just seems weird.

Separate to that, out of curiosity, which brand name laptop supports OpenBSD well enough to supply Fortune 500 companies?