I'm usually a big TechCrunch fan, but I really dislike this article.

From the last paragraph:

"It remains unclear exactly why Spark– a firm known for treating entrepreneurs well– acted this way, and there’s enough he-said-he-said behind the scenes that we may be missing some details."

A VC that is known to be entrepreneur friendly, they know they probably don't have all the details, and yet they still write an article that portrays Spark in a terrible light? I would really rather have all the facts first.