Getting torn to shreds in the Ars Technica review: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/09/review-we-do-not-reco...
Even excluding the hard requirement on a Facebook account it seems there were a lot of compromises made to get the price down.
Even excluding the hard requirement on a Facebook account it seems there were a lot of compromises made to get the price down.
If it’s a lower refresh rate and Beat Saber plays worse, that’s a big deal. As you say it’s a subjective analysis so I’ll be looking for others to corroborate or clarify that point.
Yikes
China's social credit system will need to keep pace or be horribly left behind.
Here I thought Google was the most ridiculous: if you post too many emojis on a YouTube livestream, you'll lose access to GMail, Google Drive, and all other services that are quite likely running your digital life and are important for your livelihood.
This is incredibly fitting for r/ABoringDystopia.
There's a TON to love about this headset. And the price point is simply amazing.
Feels to me like the author had an axe to grind.
Like what? Genuinely asking - I've not tried it. I read that review though and while it certainly came across as negative he brought up a LOT of huge negatives (enough that I would never consider it) - but I'm still happy to hear what you like about it!
edit: and the 90Hz refresh rate upgrade from the first Quest’s 72Hz is nothing to sneeze at. Very perceptible immersion upgrade for many.
Rather we can infer that Occulus understands the issues with the hardline on Facebook login, and wish to avoid more backlash.
>Quest 2 requires your Facebook account to log in, making it easy to meet up with friends in VR and discover communities around the world. You can explore as yourself or choose a new name by creating a unique VR profile.