There is, again, principles from real philosophy, which state that there is and always will be a principal gap between an observation (and language) based model and What Is.

The classic example is inability to tell why the sun will rise tomorrow by merely observations of it doing so and any kind of statistics.

The "why" is in understanding of the nature of the process we call Sun and realization that such kind of process cannot be stopt or even change in 24 your.

Another modern illustration of the same principle is the principal, infallible inability to infer the actual wiring if processor from the level of code it excites.

This, by the way, is the very same Upanishadic principle of inability to infer the true nature of Brahman from the level of human intellect, conditioned by a language and experience.

Some things will remain only guesses, models and "scientific", (or rather sectarian) consensus.