QAnon also predicted the exact day/hour/minute of McCains death a month before he died. Trump also posted an image that had the file hash of the image start with "DOITQ" on Twitter.
Can't blame people start to believe with these kind of predictions.
Agilent Technologies stock price will go up on Monday. Alcoa Corporation's stock price will go up on Monday. [... all the rest of the NYSE] Zynerba pharmaceuticals stock price will go up on Monday. Zyzec In's stock price will go up on Monday.
I've just made about 6500 predictions. Some of them will come true. Based on that, would you believe everything I say?
If someone makes enough predictions, some of them will come true or at least can be read as having come true. This doesn't mean that you should believe people when they predict things that they could not possibly predict.
Hold on, what did it predict exactly? Did it say "there'll be a mass shooting in New Zealand, on a specific day" or just "something violent will happen somewhere, maybe"?
You're being taken in by a very old technique; make many, many, very vague predictions. Look at the daily news every day, either personally, or farm it out to your fanbase. Cross-reference the daily news with your library of predictions, and take anything that could possibly be read as predictive. Rinse, repeat. Nostradamus was a well-known offender (or, rather, he made the predictions, his fanbase did the rest). See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postdiction#Skepticism
This sounds an awful lot like the "When he's right, he should be lauded, but when he's wrong it's because of $valid_reason." Am I summarizing what you're saying accurately?
And if so, I have to ask- is there anything which would convince you that QAnon is untrustworthy and/or full of BS? If so, what would that be?
If you Google that number, this article pops up: https://europepmc.org/article/med/24455736
Why do you want to sedate infants? Are you abusing infants?
Like, observed the type of thing they'd tell you in comments, how x and y and z lined up just right and "how do you explain that?!?!" and all that bollocks and thought "man, they're so far gone, I feel bad for them…"
You realize what you're writing today, right?
Edit: also, you're making a classic numeric error here. The likelihood of that particular "message" (DOITQ) in isolation isn't the number you're interested in, because other than the letter "Q" it doesn't contain any actual information to verify. You'd be here saying exactly the same thing if it read "DoItQ", "GoQ", "QAnon", "IluvQ", etc...
There are literally MILLIONS of trivially constructable 1-5 character strings that might be interpreted as a "message" to someone that wants to see a message. And needless to say Trump has tweeted many thousands of such "messages".
I hadn't heard the McCain prediction before, and I suspect that's going to turn out to be a bit spun too. But I'd love to see it.
Here is the prediction [1], there was also a post shortly before his death that referenced this and hinted that the month [30] and minute [:28] will be relevant in the future, but it seems to be missing in all archives. Only the QAnon post [2] mentioning this additional info after the death is avaiable.
[1] https://qposts.online/post/1706 [2] https://qposts.online/post/1933
This is getting awfully Nostradamusy for my tastes. I mean, everyone knew McCain was dying on the day he died, the announcement wasn't really a surprise. What exactly was predicted?
I'm sure the average Qultist doesn't know how hash codes work, but I would hope the HN crowd is tech-savvy enough to see how nonsensical this is.