The message is and has been "reduce, reuse, recycle." Recycling has been sold from the very beginning as being the option of last resort.
The message is and has been "reduce, reuse, recycle." Recycling has been sold from the very beginning as being the option of last resort.
Even though recycling is supposed to be the last resort, it was treated as an effective solution on its own instead. Less attention was paid to "reduce" and "reuse" and most of the attention was focused on "recycle"
If people had to recycle for real it would be more challenging and then reduce and reuse would be considered more often.
Maybe in the most literal reading of that slogan, but a claim like this could really use some substantiation.
Realistically, it probably makes sense to reuse plastic waste as fuel, if it's not economical to recycle it. But burning plastic is frowned upon.
If it's the one I remember, resolving the words of the next line was surprisingly ambiguous, with the two popular options being "...and close the loop" or "...and don't pollute"