I'm sure GP would agree, as that seems to be the reason for mentioning that the title was editorialized in the first place (and probably also why OP chose the most inflammatory quote in the source rather than the more neutral document title)

Inflammatory, click-baity titles can be "catchy" for sure, but that doesn't mean we have to use them here. The fact that it uses "wording from the legal document" doesn't make it a good title, regardless of how catchy it is.

".. please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

In any case it's a dupe as GP correctly pointed out while linking to the existing and more substantial discussion.