> The chutzpah of "big wind" profiteers! pushing their deadly renewables, part of a shadowy cabal holding back the nuclear future.
If you have a point, go ahead and make it. Hiding behind sarcasm is a bit weak intellectually and I believe is frowned upon on this site. There's a trend in society where people say sarcastic stuff to each other in an effort to put the other tribe down and 'show them' how silly they are. I believe this is deeply counter productive and extraordinarily silly. I invite you to resist such tribalistic urges.
Also, I never said 'big wind'. That was you injecting a strawman element so you can counter it with your sarcasm. Like the sarcasm, modifying what I said in order to attack it is also a very weak form of argumentation.
> he does have a PhD in particle physics
We have a different epistemic perspective. Very different. I guess you can say I don't like sophism.
> but it is nonetheless good journalism
I'll invite you to read the definition of journalism and try to objectively consider if this article fits it:
> Journalism is unbiased production and distribution of reports on current or past events based on facts and supported with proofs or evidences.