Thank you.

Not to mention in the article: No numbers are reviewed, no deaths per million KWh of energy produced. No balance of pros and cons and the mixture of energy sources needed to address a modern economy. No addressing storage or peak production demands.

I wonder who wrote the article:

> Gregory Jaczko served on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission... he is the founder of Wind Future LLC

So an ex-nuclear regulator who voted against nuclear is now a salesperson and profiteer for the wind industry.

And the article was published on a news site that implies they are 'saving our democracy from darkness'.

I feel this is such a blatant PR sub and obvious conflict of interest with no attempt at even feigning journalistic objectivity. If anything I'd say this article is less information about the perils of nuclear and instead is an example of the issues with revolving doors between regulators and the people they regulate and/or the competitors of the people they regulate plus a lack of journalistic ethics.