The kid was chased by multiple felony offenders, one with a gun, and was attacked and knocked to the ground by another with a skateboard. The video evidence clearly shows he acted in self defense
Then the police let him walk away.
Please contrast this with the same police shooting an unarmed black man seven times in the back at close range while getting into his car. Imagine if he had 2’ long rifle on him too.
I don’t relish political discussion in this forum, and I’m sorry to dang et all if I’m furthering that. It just feels like the world is on fire and it’s hard to bite your tongue when ostensibly reasonable people fundamentally disagree with things covered on video.
The black man was not unarmed, he had a knife in his hand and a gun in his car. The police fired when he reached into the car. He already had the knife in his hand and told the police he was going to grab the other
Also, Jacob Blake did not have a gun. It's stil unclear whether he was holding a knife or sunglasses.
stay to face the angry mob of anonymous individuals (wearing face-covering hoods and masks)?
Consider that RH was not running from the police, but from a mob of people shouting "Get him!" and shooting pistols. You think he still must be guilty if he chose to run from that?
That was not his business or property. He was a vigilante.
I'm not saying that he's innocent. It's just crazy how "That was not his business or property" makes a valid point today.