Bletchley Park: New crisis for code-breaking hub
bbc.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
The machines are maintained and operated by the National Museum of Computing - https://www.tnmoc.org/
There has been some conflicts by these two entities, with Bletchley Park playing dirty a few times.
Here are some of my thoughts on the place:
https://tomaytotomato.com/the-national-museum-of-computing-2...
https://www.theregister.com/2014/01/28/bletchley_park_sacks_...
It is literally next door but not part of "Bletchley Park" - BP gets all of the media attention and donations from corporate sponsors etc, but TNMOC has some equally interesting stuff (including a Collosus which is one of several claiming to be "the first computer") but does not seem to get the attention it deserves.
I found Bletchley Park itself rather boring. "This now-empty building used to house X", or "this is what Alan Turing's office looked like" is a lot less interesting than the amazing machines in the Museum of Computing.
EDIT: Fixed spelling.
When I went there were almost more volunteers than visitors, so there's no shortage of willing people to help
Everything is set up similar to how it was during the war and you can basically just walk up the desk Turing sat at. Like, I could probably have touched it if I wanted to.
I also didn't realize how many famous names in graph theory came from there.
Personally I find ironic that a monument to the use of math to help win a war gets big funds from the lottery, which essentially is a tax on the lack of knowledge of maths. ...Or maybe it's the most brilliant way to make good use of that money.
However, I would also expect the military to donate the most money, due to the huge number of soldiers lives saved through intercepting Nazi communications. Also they would deserve some form of tax exemption. It's not just about maintaining some buldings and people working there, but also keeping that memory alive, which is priceless.
Defence spending is really complicated. In the UK, annual defence spending typically pays for the cost of equipping and maintaining the armed services, but the costs of actually going on operations are usually from a separate budget. Ops (wars) are essentially a form of unpredictable expense, requested by politicians, not the generals. If the UK defence budget donated to causes like this, there would be less to spend on people, stuff, training, etc.
By way of example, the Imperial War Museum [0] is funded by government grants, charitable donations, and revenue generation through commercial activity such as retailing, licensing, and publishing
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_War_Museum
[Edit - clarity]
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24243478
(Only a small discussion so probably doesn't quite count as a dupe).
How is this a crisis at all? The museum was closed and opened with reduced attendance and doesn’t need this staff. I guess if you can’t separate the museum and the staff this is a crisis, or rather a crisis for its payroll.
If we want these sites to persist, we must be willing to cut payroll and staff, even if it means drastically reducing the hours. It’s the site that we’re preserving.
It’s probably not true now as 10+ years have gone by, but when I was there the guides were former Bletchley Park staff from during the war.