Bletchley Park Trust to undergo organisational restructure
bletchleypark.org.uk
bletchleypark.org.uk
Why not simply eliminate the private sector to ensure all smart people can't go anywhere but into public service, and get peace and prosperity for all?
Smart people shouldn't go into public service.
There is some wisdom to putting dull people in charge of governance tasks as they manage to keep themselves mostly out of the way. Too sharp, and you get sophisticated corruption as a way of life, which is the irony of countries where their cleverest people are in government. Too dull and you get mob rule and petty corruption, a junta with proverbial DMV clerks all the way down. The modern UK 'elf'n'safety state seems to lurch a bit toward the latter, so Bletchley could be a rallying point from a time when ordinary people were indeed capable of extraordinary things.
I've been there, but before it was built up into a major tourist attraction.
[1] https://bletchleypark.org.uk/visit-us/the-national-museum-of...
Does anyone know what this was about?
Why doesn't the interview just ask them 'just tell me what is the problem here?'
I don't understand how we get these news reports that explain nothing.
Not in the video, but worth noting is that the small museum are a tenant of the large museum who get use of the estate basically free from Govt.
Well I must be mad because I still can't understand it from your explanation. I know it's against policy to take them to the smaller museum and this is why he was fired... but... why?
Why did they make it against policy? Why do they not want to work with the other museum? Why do they not get along?
> basically to pretend the small museum does not exist/is not worth visiting
Why do they want to pretend that the small museum does not exist and is not worth visiting?
There's like ten fundamental and completely unexplained why's still left after your explanation. I don't know how that can be 'reasonably clear'.
I don’t know if every government department ends up like that but these ones here certainly do.
I absolutely love how prior payments to executives/trustees escapes all scrutiny. Its like “ah we didnt get Xmillion this year there is nothing we can dooo”. Which is very responsible for personal finances. Never spend your own, use other people’s money. And in a trust it is almost impossible to do it any other way. Its still interesting to me.
Whether its the remuneration given to those at the top table, the fancy offices the charities occupy in prime real estate locations, the generous use of taxis and business class flights. The list goes on.
Until such day the charity regulators put an end to it, I shall continue my no-execptions refusal to give to large charities.
I was very lucky that I got to meet Tony Sale a couple of times before he passed away, back in probably 2008 or thereabouts and he demonstrated the Colossus that he had rebuilt to me, which was a tremendous experience (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Sale).
I'd be interested to know a bit more about the breakdown of their finances. As another comment says, I wonder just how much Iain Standen, their CEO, gets paid, and whether he offered to take any kind of pay cut. Not saying it would eliminate all layoffs and / or furloughs, but it would be a meaningful gesture of solidarity.
http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Showcharity/RegisterOfC...
This is all at the same time they are kicking out their large commercial tenant who run an innovation centre (end of this year) so they can create some more museum, office and education space. I imagine this situation is not 'so severe' that they will walk back that decision.