Hacker News Reader

Comment by submeta | Hacker News Reader

An `rm -rf ` always has the potential for some desaster. Especially if you are calling it from bash history via `Ctrl + r` and hit return too fast without editing the argument after `-rf`. Actually the rm command should move files into a `~/.Trash` folder instead of immediately removing them.

View on HN

> Actually the rm command should move files into a `~/.Trash` folder instead of immediately removing them.

I remember thinking that way when I started using the command line, but I now respectfully disagree. The `mv` command already does that, and they way `rm` work is actually necessary sometimes (eg. I couldn't live without it now that I'm deleting huge files all day long).

Anecdote: when Windows was my daily driver, emptying the trash had become a mechanical task just after deleting a bunch of files anyway, so it didn't provide more safety than these useless “are you sure you want to X” dialogs you click without thinking about the question. I have lost a pair of files just because of that. When I have to use Windows these days, I mostly use shift+del to delete (ie. bypass the trash).

The nicest answers to data loss I've found so far are filesystem snapshots and proper backups. They not only protect from the occasional `rm` mistype, but from the mistyped shell redirections and bad programs as well.

PSA: There exists a tool called trash-cli that can be installed on most linuxes. Then you can `trash -r ./*` to send files to the trash. It won’t work for all situations but it’s fairly useful.

At least ctrl-r shows you what command you're about to execute. I often see advice about character sequences in bash that expand to the last command or arguments in the last command, but I have never felt comfortable using them because I can't double-check the command.

I have absolutely no clue what I've done to make it work this way (if anything), but in zsh running a command with !$ (last word from the previous command) I get the opportunity to edit the interpolated version first.

I feel like rm should default to limiting within the working directory.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com