Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by Forbo | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Forbo

It's good to be aware that this entire thing wouldn't have been possible without encryption.

I'm sorry, I'm not sure I'm seeing what point you're trying to make. Are you trying to say that Bitcoin is bad?

View on HN

Bitcoin was sold to me as freedom, from governments, from banks, etc.

But now I have come to realize that a completely unregulated payment system is very dangerous.

To be clear, Bitcoin is not "bad". Humans are bad and this is why we can't have nice things.

Bitcoin is more regulated and more spied on than most forms of payment. To turn a large amount of Bitcoin into dollars in a bank account, you have to go through extreme AML/KYC checks. I can go to a gas station in California and send $1000 in cash to someone in Turkey who could receive cash and walk out a few minutes later. A briefcase full of cash is not regulated at all and can be used to settle debt or pay taxes, unlike Bitcoin. The only advantage of Bitcoin is not requiring the risk of physical presence, which has to be <1% of all crime. Also, unlike cash, Bitcoin by design retains a full immutable public ledger. The criminals can mix their coins, but it'd still be possible (although computationally expensive) to recreate a chain of transactions going back to the original ransom. In the future if Bitcoin is to become used in commerce more, it should be expected that these dirty transaction outputs would be worth less than clean ones or not accepted, like dollar bills cut in half taped together.

If a chemical plant sets up in an area then pollutes the environment during the course of business, it is required to clean up the mess. Known risks are required to have mitigations ready, and sometimes-expensive procedures must be followed to ensure safety.

Bitcoin (and everything like it) is very much at the "Pollute the environment with whatever the hell I want" phase of its existence. That should change.

Bitcoin should be taxed to recover the externalized costs it imposes -- basically, compensate the victims of bitcoin-enabled crime.

Is only a small fraction of bitcoin usage related to crime? No problem -- the tax will be very low.

We don't have a tax to compensate the victims of crimes enabled by cash, gift cards, Western Union, wire transfers, etc. Sorry, but I'm still not seeing the point being made here.

In what way did you buy into Bitcoin? I don’t understand what choice was presented to you.

If you’re referring to why people like it, those things can all be true despite criminals also using it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com