Agree this is a good idea.
To clarify: it'd be cool if language's supported multiple lexemes (?) for a single token. So -> and → (U-2192) are equivalent.
To clarify: it'd be cool if language's supported multiple lexemes (?) for a single token. So -> and → (U-2192) are equivalent.
Not only does it have it, it has it in (what I feel) is a really accessible way. Seen a symbol and you don't know what it is or how to reproduce it? Enter "?" and paste them symbol into the repl and it'll tell you what's it's called, the shortcut to make it, what it does, and the equivalent non-symbol function name.