For a few years, I've thought that attending the Recurse Center could be a great thing to do.

Now I'm reading this story, and the story itself destroyed about 50% of my interest in the Recurse Center.

I'd expect an institution like the Recurse Center to be able to see what happened here, make a graceful accommodation in this instance, and try to improve it in the future. This story is about a systems-level failure, not an individual-level failure.

So, RC acting as if this is an individual-level failure is extremely off-putting to me.

I don't think I have an unreasonable take on the situation. So now this /u/rcthrowaway account shows up... and it's odd to me.

If it represents Recurse Center, I'm baffled at how tone-deaf the account is, and it's _rapidly_ destroying the other 50% of my interest in RC.

If I found out, conclusively, that this anonymous account speaks for RC, I will never again consider attending RC.

Which makes me think - how might I speak, if _I_ created an anonymous account, and wanted to destroy the reputation of an institution? I'd say exactly the kinds of things that the anonymous account is saying.

So it's either 1) tonedeaf and revealing of deep institutional ill-health, or 2) a false-flag operation trying to attack the Recurse Center.

If option 2 is true, my interest and curiosity is sparked, and maybe I _would_ attend RC.

I'm in the middle of a long sabbatical from work. I could do it right now if I wanted to, but this story strikes it completely from my list.

If you're out there and reading this, Recurse Center, I would recommend adopting a perspective that your side of this story looks _really bad_.

Edit: Spelling. For years I thought it was the "Recourse" center, not "Recurse" center. TIL!