They’re also not allowed to vote. That part at least make sense to me.
This argument applies to basically all asylum seekers, not just those from the Syrian civil war.
That aside, how many unskilled jobs that don’t require idiomatic grasp of English in local accents (which would include cashiers, baristas, and other customer-facing roles) aren’t being replaced by robots and offshoring?
[0] http://www.salaryexplorer.com/salary-survey.php?loc=211&loct...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugees_of_the_Syrian_Civil_W...
I don't know how you'd describe doctors as low-skilled.
You could say that the leadership of the right is desperate for immigration and to get people on benefits. Immigration gives nativists someone to look down on, making them easier to exploit. Paying sub-poverty-level benefits is cheap and makes the workforce desperate to accept just-about-poverty-level wages. The working class exists in order to frighten the middle class. The underclass exists to frighten the working class.
Also bear in mind that illegal immigrants do not get "hooked on benefits", they get deported or exploited by "economic libertarians".
That was the point.