> 95% of programming isn’t hard
> It’s easy to screw up the 95%, though
To me, those just don't seem like compatible assertions. If something isn't easy to get right, what else do I call it but "hard"?
> It’s easy to screw up the 95%, though
To me, those just don't seem like compatible assertions. If something isn't easy to get right, what else do I call it but "hard"?
No programmer is good enough to build a walking algorithm that is 1% as good.