If your banana is for resale and you pay cash: Credit Cash (decrease assets) and Debit Trading Stock (increase assets). Accounting equation is balanced.
If your banana is for consumption and you buy it on credit from your supplier: Credit Loan account (increase liabilities). Debit Food Expenses (decrease equity). Accounting equation is balanced.
If your banana is for resale and you buy it on credit: Debit Trading Stock (increase assets). Credit Loan account (increase liabilities). Accounting equation is balanced.
If your banana is for resale and it spoils before you sell it: Credit Trading Stock (decrease assets) and Debit Spoilage Expenses (decrease equity). Accounting equation is balanced.
If your banana is for resale and you sell it [this one I'm a bit rustier on, it's been 25 years, but I'm pretty sure it's correct]: Debit cash (increase assets). Credit Sales income (increase equity). ALSO Debit Cost of Sales (an expense, so decrease equity). Credit trading stock (decrease assets). Accounting equation is balanced. (Your Gross Profit is reflected in Sales minus Cost of Sales).
Granted, these are unsophisticated examples, and based solely on decades-old high school-level accountancy, but I think your banana example should be covered here.
> Then debit Food Expenses (decrease equity) and credit Cash (decrease assets)
Why are you decreasing the number in two columns?
I don't really need to know personally, but I hope this gives you an idea of what kind of things confuses people.
I don't think the basis of double accounting in the sense that "every thing in and out must end up equalling zero" is super sophisticated concept to grasp, at least superficially.
But once it is applied to situations where things intuitively are just going out of your budget (like buying and eating something: you're left with no money and no banana) and on top of that use counter-intuitive words, I hope you can appreciate that people get confused.
It's not two columns, it's both sides of the equation:
Assets = Equity + Liabilities
So if you're decreasing equity, but not gaining any liability, then the only option is to decrease assets to be balanced.
You’ll need to maintain consistency and coherence in multiple combinations of the above, and when the auditors show up, be able to show unequivocally that you understood every edge case when recording and reporting transactions, especially the ones that crossed a financial year boundary.
Accounting software mechanises all this. It is not simple.
The problem isn't just terminology, but when people use the term double-entry accounting interchangeably with double-entry book-keeping, they reveal how little they know about the subject matter, and how unqualified they are to be implementing either.